Law360 Expert Analysis

PFAS OUT Cannot Replace Broad Drinking Water Protections

PFAS OUT is an EPA outreach program for public water systems. EPA contacts systems with elevated PFOA or PFOS and points them to treatment guidance and funding information. The enforceable limits come from EPA’s drinking water rule. EPA has said it plans to rescind and reconsider the parts of that rule covering PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and chemical mixtures. This analysis explains why outreach cannot stand in for enforceable limits. It also covers what a narrower rule means for water systems, regulated companies and communities in PFAS litigation.

The complete article opens in a new tab. The full text is also embedded below on desktop.

This analysis first appeared as a Law360 Expert Analysis column on April 28, 2026. Law360 holds the original publication; the version hosted here is provided for readers without Law360 access. Read it on the source at Law360.

Read the analysis

Common questions

What is EPA's PFAS OUT program?

PFAS OUT, short for PFAS Outreach, is an EPA program launched on April 14, 2026. EPA identifies public water systems with elevated PFOA or PFOS and contacts them directly. It connects them with treatment guidance, funding information and technical-assistance resources. EPA says the program itself provides no direct funding or direct technical assistance.

Which PFAS drinking water limits is EPA reconsidering?

On May 14, 2025, EPA said it would keep the national drinking water standards for PFOA and PFOS. It also said it intends to rescind and reconsider the limits for PFHxS, PFNA and HFPO-DA, known as GenX, along with the hazard index for mixtures. That announcement was a plan to revisit those parts of the rule through further rulemaking.

Does rescinding a PFAS limit mean the chemical is safe?

No. A rescission changes the rule, and it makes no finding about safety. The effect in litigation is on evidence. A federal standard is a strong reference point in a contamination case. Without one, plaintiffs may have to work harder to show why PFHxS, PFNA, GenX or combined exposure is still a serious health and legal issue.

More from David Meldofsky

Lawsuit Intelligencer Editorial analysis of mass torts and the business of plaintiff-side law
Lawsuit Informer Plain-English public legal education on lawsuits and consumer rights
Lawsuit Center Attorney intake and referral for mass tort cases